Answer:
Explanation:
Score
Response Features
2 point
There is a valid claim/inference made relating to the question.
There are 2 or more pieces of evidence that support the claim/inference.
Evidence is clearly explained.
Few or no errors made in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization.
1 point
There is a claim/inference made relating to the question with one piece of supporting evidence.
OR
There are 2 pieces of supporting evidence but no clear claim/inference.
Incomplete sentence or bullets
0 point
There is no claim, inference, or evidence
A response that is unintelligible or indecipherable.
Glow:
Grow
⊃
Formal is a description of what the artist has done and how he has done it. contextual critism is a discution evaluation
B: Predicate.
Predicates are the part of a sentence or clause containing a verb and stating something about the subject
A tautogram
from wikipedia :
A tautogram (Greek: tauto gramma, "same letter") is a text in which all words start with the same letter. Historically, tautograms were mostly poetical forms ([1]). The difference between a tautogram and alliteration is that tautograms are a written, visual phenomenon, whereas alliterations are a phonetic one. Most cases of alliteration are also tautograms, though certainly not all since different letters can frequently take on the same sound (e.g., circle segment or Catcher Ken). Similarly, most tautograms are also alliterations, although exceptions exist when using letters with multiple pronunciations (e.g., crazy child or pneumatic plate).
The answer is: (B) Magnificent should be written, "Magnificent!"
When citing what someone else has said, quotation marks are used. In this case, the expression takes an exclamation mark, which should be placed within the quotation marks.
The rest of the options are incorrect because it is proper to introduce quotation marks when citing, in choice C the exclamation mark is outside the quotation marks, and the use of semicolon is unnecessary to introduce a quotation.
