An agent made written disclosure to his employing broker-dealer that he intends to execute a series of private securities transa
ctions with clients who do not have accounts with his broker-dealer. The agent did not acquire express written permission from the broker-dealer and did not receive compensation for executing the transactions, but did receive written acknowledgment of receipt of the agent's notice. In this case, the agent A) is required to register as a broker-dealer B) performed a matched trade as permitted under the rules C) is guilty of selling away D) engaged in an agency cross transaction
In the case when the securities are sold so the agents are prohibited from the transactions that are not recorded in the books of broker-dealer until there are authorized transactions in writing via the broker- dealer before to execution. If this cannot be happen so we called it as selling away
also the notification receipt would not be similar as the authorization
As the company expensed the asset fully in the year of purchase instead of capitalizing it, the asset is an ordinary asset not a capital one which is capitalized. That is the tax status.
The gain on an ordinary asset is the amount that it was sold for which in this case is $60,000.
<span>The answer to this
question is “availability of substitutes“. The reduction
in the number of people riding trains is due to the fact that a new substitute,
automobile, is available in the market.</span>
<span>
Hope that helps!</span>
