<span>The characteristic that describes privatization of Social Security is option C) enables Americans to invest their Social Security Contributions in the stock market. This is the most accurate option but still not wholly accurate. There are different proposals for privatizing. Most would have the existing funds used to buy into the market and then the individual person would have different options for how their own funds were then handled within the market. For instance they could take over control of their fund and buy/sell their various shares. Or they could move their shares to be handled by an investment company, or even just leave them in the original shares that were bought by the government during the transition to privatization. Bottom line, the individuals would have some control of there shares in the stock market.</span>
It depends what for... but If its really important, u would say 50,000
Answer:
the beta of the second stock is 1.77
Explanation:
The beta of the second stock is shown below;
Investment in each = (1 ÷ 3)
Now as we know that
Portfolio beta = Respective investments × Respective weights
1 = (1 ÷ 3 × 1.23) + (1 ÷ 3 × beta of the second stock) + (1 ÷ 3 × 0)
We assume the Beta of risk-free assets would be zero
1 = 0.41 + (1 ÷ 3 × beta of the second stock)
The beta of the second stock is
= (1 - 0.41) × 3
= 1.77
Hence, the beta of the second stock is 1.77
The sub-treasury plan, the federal government would hold crops in public warehouses and issue loans on their value until they could be profitably sold.
<h3>Why did Farmers face an increasing debt load in the late 1800s?</h3>
They were caught between increased costs and falling prices.
<h3>
Why did the Grange movement focus on reducing prices that railroads and grain elevators charged? </h3>
Farmers relied on railroads and grain elevators but were forced to pay higher than usual rates.
<h3>
To learn more about sub-treasury system visit:</h3>
brainly.com/question/16824604
#SPJ4
