I would say C but i haven’t watched what your suppose to be watching. Sorry if i couldn’t help you.
Pluralism is the theory that all interests are and should be free to compete for influence in the government and the outcome of this competition is compromise and moderation.
Pluralism is the view that politics and decision-making are principally within the framework of state, however that a lot of non-governmental groups use their resources to exert their impact. The central question for classical pluralism is how power and influence are distributed during a political process.
India is an example of a pluralistic society as here are so many religious communities and they do not blend but are identified as separate entities which are concerning with their own interests, values and beliefs.
To learn more about Government here
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
Answer:
King Philip II of Spain was, personality-wise, less cautious than Elizabeth I of England. He sought a more active foreign policy, in part because he had to, since he was not only a king, but the emperor of a huge Spanish Empire that included territories all over the world.
King Philip was a devout catholic who saw himself as a defender of the Pope, and as a leader of the counter-reformation. His anti-protestanism was one of his motivations for invading England in 1588.
Elizabeth I was more reserved, in part because he did not have as much power as Philip II. She was the king of a small island-country, not the empress of a transoceanic empire. She was relatively tolerant of other religiouns while being anglican herself.
She did not had a lot military success until the Anglo-English war when her army defeated the Spanish Armada.
I don’t understand that language.
