Answer:
A sentence too long for it's belly
Explanation:
I do not know the story but this is the "formula" for writing an analysis:
Topic Sentence: Use the title, author, and genre of the book and describe what you are going to analyze.
Sentence #2: Quote the text (ex. For example, the author tells of how the dog "ran from his owner" and attempted to "fiercly chase the cat" as the "ran through" the street (Paragraph 6).)
Sentence #3: Analyze what you just wrote and say why it ralated to your topic.
Sentence #4: Same as #2
Sentence #5: Same as #3
Sentence #6: Conclusion sentence that says the topic again in a different way.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It is not good because it is not giving any evidence, nor is it using any type of fact in order to prove its effectiveness or lack thereof.
Answer:
Explanation: Crucially, positive discrimination allows an employer to pick a candidate specifically on the basis of their protected characteristic, whereas a company can only evoke positive action when choosing who to hire or promote “if it is faced with two candidates who are 'as qualified as' each other”, says free-access HR
A nonessential phrase, as the name itself states, is not really that important to the sentence - if that part were deleted, the sentence would still make perfect sense. These phrases are always separated from the rest of the sentence with commas. Therefore, the correct answer is <span>C. Drivers must complete a written test, according to the Department of Transportation, before receiving their driver’s license.
The nonessential phrase here is <em>according to the Department of Transportation. </em></span>