Answer:
C. To prove the correct interpretation of a piece of literature based on fact
Answer: the author supports the idea that female pilots were treated differently than male pilots by stating that women were not “meant” to do risky jobs. It emphasizes that everybody did not expect women to step up to the challenge of doing risky jobs.
Explanation:
hope this helps :))))
Okay, I saw another question like this before. I cant write an essay for you. But I can give you pointers and tips.
1) Why did you come to Marion's party? Had you been invited?
2) The meeting was so chaotic. Had it been planned by anyone?
3) How long had the body been frozen before the scientists found it?
4) Had the man been known to the police when he turned up in the town?
5) How many times had your application been rejected before you succeeded?
6) Why did you take your raincoat? Had rainy weather been forecast | forecasted?
7) Had the parcel just been delivered when I arrived?
8) How long had it been forbidden before it was allowed again?
9) Why did the police arrive along with the firemen? Had the house been set on fire?
10) I didn't get the money on Friday. Had it been sent a long time before that?
<h2>
I hope I helped you ^_^</h2>