<span>I believe that the
correct answer is (b). As the tribe divided over voluntary removal, Elias
Boudinot and John Ridge became the two Cherokee leaders of opposite viewpoints.
Boudinot considered that the removal was inevitable and signed the Treaty of New
Echota in 1835 with other treaty supporters. On the other hand, the chief of
Cherokee nation, John Ridge, tried to stop white political leaders from forcing
them to move; he was backed by the majority. Their resistance resulted in the "Trail
of Tears" (Nu na da ul tsun yi (the place where they cried)) in which
one-fourth of the Cherokee forced to move died.</span>
Answer:
B. folk
Explanation:
<u>Joshua Johnson was the painter of the style called naive or folk art.</u>
<u>This means he had no formal training but was self-taught and that their art usually lacks formal components (perspective, composition, anatomy, etc.) and focuses more on simplicity and frankness.</u>
The meaning of folk art in this sense means it comes from normal, everyday people, usually in the village environment.
<u>There is not much known about Johnson, but it has been discovered that he had no previous education when it comes to art. As he was a mixed-race man of white father and black, slave mother, he certainly had no chance to pursue the education he needed. All of his paintings have a certain simplicity, stiff faces, and objects that keep repeating themselves. </u>
Today, his work is part of museum collections.
Answer:
It offered to grant independence to the American colonists.
Explanation: l know you already answered this on your assignment-- but tnx for the points and sorry hshs
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
According to the passage, the land reforms developed in Guatemala might have encouraged similar reforms and social movements in other countries of Central America.
As per the author, this reforms which had a socialist connotation, might have been really dangerous for the interests of the upper class members like bussinessmen and landowners. Also, the reforms might have had a negative over the interests of multinational companies.
Churchill began by praising the United States, which he declared stood “at the pinnacle of world power.” It soon became clear that a primary purpose of his talk was to argue for an even closer “special relationship” between the United States and Great Britain