1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
3 years ago
11

What finally broke Europe out of the social structure it was in during the medieval era?

History
1 answer:
yarga [219]3 years ago
4 0

What finally broke Europe out of the social structure it was in during the medieval era is known as the "Plague."

This is because the medieval era in Europe lasted between 500AD to 1400AD.

  • During this era, the emergence of the Plague, particularly the "Black Death" between 1347-1352 totally affected the social structure of Europe at that time.
  • As the population decreases, the feudal system was greatly affected.

Thus, the social structure of Europe was changed in the subsequent years.

Learn more here:  brainly.com/question/20588606

You might be interested in
What was a key cause for the rise of fascism in nations such as Italy and Germany
Illusion [34]
The key cause was economic hardship
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a paragraph explaining how life in the West was different from life in the East.
Alex73 [517]
Life in the West were settled groups,bringing and maintaining cultures as they struggled hard to become Americans.Ethnic groups arrived,started settling as groups,keeping and enjoying their cultures while becoming americans.Life in the East there was british influence.Families have been in the U.S.A much longer.Many families would signifiance on splitting from the family and friends into making their own way.The kids would often move away to other states or cities to start their own families.
3 0
3 years ago
In 1754, a group of delegates from Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, and New England met in Albany. Their original intent was to
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

negotiate a treaty with the Iroquois.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
What are the main reasons spain createed colonies in the new world?
Vika [28.1K]

Motivations for colonization were to extract gold and silver from the Americans, to stimulate the Spanish economy and make Spain a more powerful country.Spain was also aiming to convert all native Americans to Christianity.

Hope this helped (:!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best example of good citizenship through civic participation?
    13·1 answer
  • The Wade-Davis Bill was an unsuccessful bill named after two leading Republican members of Congress unhappy with Lincoln’s Ten-P
    9·1 answer
  • _____ caused the Americans to not continue to attack the British outside of Philadelphia after the British retreated for the fir
    15·2 answers
  • How did the differences between Ignatius’ society and older orders reflect the changes of the Counter-Reformation?
    13·1 answer
  • Farmers who attempted to farm in the Plains by plowing the land were called
    8·1 answer
  • What was the turning point of the battle of Gettysburg?
    13·2 answers
  • Democrats and republicans aren’t just divided. They live in different worlds. True or false
    9·2 answers
  • How did American cause Altair’s in Vietnam affect public opinion back
    14·2 answers
  • From which perspective is the 1st person point of view story told?
    6·1 answer
  • Which would not be a plebeian?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!