1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex17521 [72]
3 years ago
6

Can someone please help me with this it’s due today at 3:06

History
1 answer:
ahrayia [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It is an anti war poem

I don't think he romanticizing war

About the nature of fighting, he portrays it as ruthless

Explanation:

I think this because it is stating the sad bits about what happens in war. There are several parts that support the claim, for example, "All went lame, all blind; Drunk with; deaf even to the hoots Of gas- shells dropping softly behind." This piece of information proves that this is an anti war poem because it put a negative connotation on what happens in war.

I don't think he is necessarily romanticizing the War. I think the author is just trying to write it more appealingly. This is becuase there is explaining in the poem about the effects of the war. What happens to the families and the people who served. PUT TEXT EVIDENCE

About the nature of fighting, he portrays it as ruthless. He does this by describing the actions in the war, and the results of the War. PUT TEXT EVIDENCE

You might be interested in
What was the American strategy for the war against Japan in the Pacific?
Maslowich

Answer: the answer is D

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
When rome became the capital of italy in 1871 the pope of the roman catholic church A/remained hostile to the government of ital
Nutka1998 [239]
I believe the answer is A.
7 0
3 years ago
What groups supported the patriot war efforts
Ivanshal [37]
The French, Spain, and Minutemen
7 0
3 years ago
How was the new government of the United States similar to the government under British rule
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.

8 0
3 years ago
Which most likely causes the water table to rise?
kherson [118]
A is the answer to the question
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following describes a similarity between world war 1 and world war 2?
    10·2 answers
  • In the case gregory v. chicago the supreme court supported the demonstrators freedom of assembly since the demonstratatiors were
    12·2 answers
  • The mother of all people was Mary. True or False
    8·2 answers
  • HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the cotton gin lead to more slavery?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the differences between a kingdom and a nation-state?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the Supreme Court decide in the Citizens United case?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following emperors made Christianity legal to practice in the Roman Empire?
    9·2 answers
  • Need help ASAP I will mark you brainleist
    11·1 answer
  • The conditions Alexis de Tocqueville described in The Republic of the United
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!