There were 10 slave states and 11 free states
Answer:
The correct answer is: Dwight D. Eisenhower won the presidential election.
Explanation:
When he became the U.S. President, Dwight D. Eisenhower went to Korea in order to find a solution to end the Korean War. We could even say that thanks to the Korean War, Eisenhower was elected the new U.S. president.
During his presidential campaign, President Truman, challenged Eisenhower to find an adequate solution for the Korean War. Eisenhower said that if he were the president, he would personally go to Korea to terminate the war. This statement raised his popularity and helped him to become the U.S. president.
Shortly after the elections, Eisenhower fulfilled his promise and went to Korea. When he returned to the U.S. he adopted a tough policy toward communism in Korea and threatened to Chinese communists that he would use even a nuclear weapon if the peace negotiation began to move forward. After that, the Chinese agreed to the U.S. terms in 1953.
Answer:
you'll need to paraphrase
Explanation:
Aishol-pan, a 13-year-old girl, trains to become the first female in 12 generations of her Kazakh family to become an eagle hunter and rises to the pinnacle of a tradition that has been handed down from father to son for centuries. While there are many old Kazakh eagle hunters who vehemently reject the idea of any female taking part in their ancient tradition, Aisholpan's father, Nurgaiv, believes that a girl can do anything a boy can, as long as she's determined.
The correct answer is <span>B.Little money was invested in technology or infrastructure not related to exports.
This means that you could see super developed roads that were used for export, and right next to them you could see a village that was still made out of clay and straw and with shacks and similar things. Anything that wasn't related to the industry and export was severely underdeveloped compared to the industry.</span>
In telling the history of the United States and also of the nations of the Western Hemisphere in general, historians have wrestled with the problem of what to call the hemisphere's first inhabitants. Under the mistaken impression he had reached the “Indies,” explorer Christopher Columbus called the people he met “Indians.” This was an error in identification that has persisted for more than five hundred years, for the inhabitants of North and South America had no collective name by which they called themselves.
Historians, anthropologists, and political activists have offered various names, none fully satisfactory. Anthropologists have used “aborigine,” but the term suggests a primitive level of existence inconsistent with the cultural level of many tribes. Another term, “Amerindian,” which combines Columbus's error with the name of another Italian explorer, Amerigo Vespucci (whose name was the source of “America”), lacks any historical context. Since the 1960s, “Native American” has come into popular favor, though some activists prefer “American Indian.” In the absence of a truly representative term, descriptive references such as “native peoples” or “indigenous peoples,” though vague, avoid European influence. In recent years, some argument has developed over whether to refer to tribes in the singular or plural—Apache or Apaches—with supporters on both sides demanding political correctness.