1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
3 years ago
5

How did the Civil Rights Act of 1968 impact the state of Washington?

Law
2 answers:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c.) It ended housing discrimination in King County.

Explanation:

The 1968 act enlarged on acts and forbid discrimination regarding the rental and financing of houses based on race, sex, or religion.

Tomtit [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

edge 2021

You might be interested in
Does anyone want 2 do pad let????????
jasenka [17]

yes sure any words that means yes

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Administrative law consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of the president. true or false
arlik [135]

Answer: True

Explanation: Administrative law- Consists of the rules, orders, and decisions of administrative agencies. Dominant element in the regulatory environment of business.Administrative agency- A federal, state, or local government agency established to perform a specific function.Federal Agencies-At the national level, the cabinet departments of the executive branch include numerous executive agencies. Food and drug administration is an example is an agency within the US department of Health and Human services, theseexecutive agencies are subject to the authority of the president, who has the power to appoint and remove their officers.

8 0
3 years ago
Contrast a democracy with a dictorship
oee [108]

Answer:

In a democracy the government has less control over how people spend their time and what they believe. People are free to join clubs, political parties and other groups. In a dictatorship there's just one leader who has total control over the party and the country.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Can someone answer both of them? If not answer only 10! Will mark brainliest
Nina [5.8K]
Answer for 10 and 11

10. Yes

11. Code
7 0
3 years ago
Over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.
nexus9112 [7]

The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
  • For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.

This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.

More information:

brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ is best described as a court’s order to an agent to return any funds earned as a result of breaching the duty of loyalty i
    13·1 answer
  • The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the d
    13·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS HELP FAST!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Polices of human trafficking
    11·1 answer
  • Will give 34 points and brainliest
    5·2 answers
  • Create a want ad for a member of Congress. In the ad, include qualifications, benefits and salary, and skills needed.
    15·1 answer
  • What reasons can you give for excluding from jury service members of the
    6·1 answer
  • Why haven’t people developed a perfectly safe Internet?
    9·2 answers
  • 30 POINTS TIMER PLS HELP PLATO CIVIS
    8·1 answer
  • 25. When can motorists cross over bicycle lanes?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!