Answer: it’s C or D how do I know?...
Explanation: The SDS-organized March Against the Vietnam War onto Washington, D.C. was the largest anti-war demonstration in the U.S. to date with 15,000 to 20,000 people attending. Paul Potter demands a radical change of society.
Answer:
When a new law was proposed, all the citizens of Athens had the opportunity to vote on it. To vote, citizens had to attend the assembly on the day the vote took place. This form of government is called direct democracy. ... Ostraka are shards of pottery that were used as a voting ballot in ancient Greece.
Answer: He lacked experience as a diplomat and legislator.
Explanation:
John Reynolds was a Royal Navy officer who was the Governor of Colonial Georgia from 1754–1757. Even though he had come to Georgia with lofty aspirations which he planned to improve the colony as Governor, when he left the colony 1757 the colony had gone on the decline.
Some of the reasons this happened was Reynolds poor showing as a diplomat and a Legislator. Reynolds did not know how to negotiate with people because he entertained no challenges to his authority.
In the same vein was his failure to negotiate with Creek Indians as he abandoned a proposed meeting before they arrived because he thought he had been made to wait too long ( waited 10 days).
In legislative duties he failed as well. He was constantly arguing with the Council that he himself created and refused to share information with them to enable them do their jobs properly. He additional dissolved the Commons House of Assembly because he thought they were challenging his authority.
Answer:
Majority leader.
Explanation:
The Majority leader is the head of the Senate. He is designated by a vote of the party senators who are in majority in the Senate. He opens and ends sessions, he controls the parliamentary agenda. Nevertheless, the function of president of the Senate belongs to the vice president, he may join the sessions and vote. The majority whip is the second-in-command, so to speak, of the majority party in the Senate, the immediate leader of all his or her fellow party senators.
Assuming this takes place before the USSR joined the war in June 1941, the war would have been won. Up until that point pretty much all of Europe had been taken over, and so if Britsinbhad not held out until 1941 Nazi Germany would have won the war.
However, to answer your question they would have had an easier time against the USSR and the USA, presuming that Operation Barbarossa still takes place and so does Pearl Harbour.
<span>This is because although Britain was bankrupt(and obviously the land less would have ended) and so had no monetary funds, but its Empire meant that assuming the entire Empire swore aliiegance to Nazi Germany rather than continuing to fight despite Great Britainbitself being conquered, they would have lots of land and some extra troops from around the enpire to that would have benefited all fronts of the war. Also the Germans would have the Supermaribe Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Hawker Hurricanes (this is assuming that all British planes are not destroyed during the Blitzkrieg plan) with which to fill the gaps in their Luftwaffe, which was heavily depleted in the Battle of Britain. They would also have the schematics for the Spitfire, allowing them to build more, the Spirfire was a very useful plane.</span>
