1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexeev081 [22]
3 years ago
5

The “Atlanta Compromise” is the name given to the

History
1 answer:
tresset_1 [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:a

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0
3 years ago
What happened during the civil war?
Mamont248 [21]
A bunch of guns shooting pew pew
8 0
3 years ago
What are five consequences of World War I? Lots of points so please give FIVE specific reasons, not 3 general reasons... :-)
Gennadij [26K]
<span>There were global consequences for WWI, because it included more countries than any previous war, it also resulted on more deaths than any previous war. WWI caused the decay of monarchies and rise of fascism. WWI also changed the face of modern warfare by implementing tanks, submarines, airplane-dropped bombs, machine guns, and poison gas.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was common in communal living?
salantis [7]
D. All of the above (if this isn’t correct I apologize)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rules of a group are based upon the religious beliefs of the majority of that group. True False
Viktor [21]

False it is based on the one that is in charged

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the people's party fare in the presidential election of 1892?
    14·1 answer
  • How long did ww2 last
    12·2 answers
  • How did the scientific revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries lead to change in the way people thought about society and gove
    12·1 answer
  • Which European explorer is credited with discovering the Americas in starting an exchange of plants animals germs ideas and tech
    15·1 answer
  • Why was Bismarck relevant?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand instigate the collapse of peace in Europe?
    14·1 answer
  • The Reformation in England stemmed from a difference of opinion between
    11·1 answer
  • American History Section 1BC / Module 8.
    15·2 answers
  • What was the result of the Tiananmen Square protests?
    8·1 answer
  • Plss help will mark brainliest!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!