Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer:
After deliberation, a jury reports that it is deadlocked and unable to decide on a verdict.
Explanation:
used when jurors cant decide on a verdict, and dislodge jurors from entrenched positions
-example Allen v US 164 U.S 492 (1896)
hope this helps
Answer:
The candidate who spends the most money usually wins
Explanation:
Answer: B
Explanation:
Driving below the speed limit is considered just as dangerous as speeding over the speed limit
Answer:
She may face between 7-20 years imprisonment and/or a also may be required to pay a huge fines.
Explanation:
Once an individual is found guilty of making a false statement which violates the federal statute, such person can face up to 5 years imprisonment and a huge fine of up to $250,000.
However, if this fine relates to terrorism as the case may be in the example, then the convicted felon faces up to 8 years and a maximum of 20 years in prison sentence. It may also include huge fines.