1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
11

It ensures individual liberty and social enrichment called what?​

History
1 answer:
levacccp [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Freedom is necessary to generate progress; people also value freedom as an important

component of progress. This chapter will contend that both propositions are correct. Without

liberty, there will be little or no progress; most people will consider an expansion in freedom as

progress. Neither proposition would win universal acceptance. Some would argue that a

totalitarian state can marshal the resources to generate economic growth. Many will contend that

too much liberty induces libertine behavior and is destructive of society, peace, and the family.

For better or worse, the record shows that freedom has increased throughout the world

over the last few centuries and especially over the last few decades. There are of course many

examples of non-free, totalitarian, ruthless government on the globe, but their number has

decreased and now represents a smaller proportion of the world’s population. Perhaps this growth

of freedom is partially responsible for the breakdown of the family and the rise in crime, described

in the previous chapter. Dictators do tolerate less crime and are often very repressive of deviant

sexual behavior, but, as the previous chapter reported, divorce and illegitimacy are more connected

with improved income of women than with a permissive society. Moreover, the ability to rid

oneself of a objectionable mate improves the well-being of the adults involved and may leave the

children no worse than if they had been raised by two antagonistic parents.

A police state can also repress much crime, although no government can totally rid society

of lawlessness. Democracies can also take vigorous action against crime, but protecting the

innocent from government intrusion hampers the effectiveness of law enforcement. The state can

make two types of errors: they can arrest, prosecute and convict and innocent individual or they

can fail to arrest, prosecute or convict a guilty one. Repressive dictators typically are more willing

to make the first type of error and allow the innocent to be caught up with the guilty. Elected

You might be interested in
What is resistance government and why is it important to American value
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Rights of resistance to illegitimate government is a principle that states that authority is derived from the consent of the governed and that the sole purpose of the government is to protect individual liberties. If the government can no longer do so then the people shoould change or abolish it.

hope that this helped you

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a result of the Magna Carta
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial.

hope this helped

please give brainlist

7 0
3 years ago
What was the name of the group of men led by Oliver Cromwell who fought against the Royalist in the English Civil War
Leni [432]
It would be B cavaliers
7 0
3 years ago
For SEO, key words should be used no more than 8 percent of the time. <br><br> True<br><br> False
alexgriva [62]
<span>For SEO, key words should be used no more than 8 percent of the time. 
</span>



false

8 0
3 years ago
When did Dred Scott sue for freedom for himself and his family?
Llana [10]

Answer: C

Explanation: Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was an enslaved African American man in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott case". Scott claimed that he and his wife should be granted their freedom because they had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I need ideas for a 28th amendment this is for a project and i can't think of any good ones.
    7·1 answer
  • What is the fastest animal
    8·2 answers
  • How did Britain’s status as a world power change after the Seven Years’ War?
    10·1 answer
  • What type of rock typically contains fossils in Oklahoma
    8·2 answers
  • What does each segment of the snake represent?
    12·1 answer
  • Many European countries work
    14·2 answers
  • What is the Cause and Effect of the Self-Strengthening movement in China? Please put it in a sentence
    14·1 answer
  • What was home life and culture like in early China
    15·1 answer
  • 1. A/An<br> is a form of government in which citizens<br> choose their leaders by voting.
    10·1 answer
  • Which are examples of how Lester Maddox changed his views on race relations?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!