1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
atroni [7]
3 years ago
12

In the space provided, analyze the viewpoints of both Northerners and Southerners in regard to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. What inf

luenced each group’s perspective on the act?
History
2 answers:
natali 33 [55]3 years ago
3 0
 In the south most people saw it as a good thing towards their freedom, in the north they saw it as a massacre from the south.



Hope this helps.

IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
3 0
Slavery was quite high level in South, so they considered it as their Freedom whereas Northerns considered it as "massacre" from the South.

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Which most accurately describes events leading to the fall of the Roman Empire?
tekilochka [14]
<span>The answer is:
Visigoths sacked Rome after Emperor Constantine moved the Roman capital to Constantinople.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
mina [271]
The answer is D. to maintain the old way of life
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is im
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.

The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.

While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".

By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.

In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."

In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."

In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.

In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."

The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.

3 0
3 years ago
Please help me I need help so bad right now on this please help me on questions 4 and 5 thank you
Anika [276]
The first one is many died from overwork...
second one is by teaching native americans...
4 0
3 years ago
How is tyranny practiced?
castortr0y [4]
Tyranny is the practice of one person or power/government being in total control. Its practiced when they illegally take control of a people or governmnet and make them follow thier rules. Tyranny is very illegal. when you see this word you should think of the british in the time of the early americas. the constitution addresess tyranny quite a bit. the founding fathers made sure that one person couldnt seize control of our government.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who illustrated the light bulb
    5·2 answers
  • How did the fifth amendment expand democracy in the united states
    15·1 answer
  • Why we're concessions made to the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe and Asia
    7·1 answer
  • How did Christianity contribute to the fall of Axum and its economy?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the reporting of the USS Maine sinking lead to an American declaration of war in 1898?
    12·1 answer
  • Which countries formed armies against France?
    12·1 answer
  • Fill in the blanks
    5·1 answer
  • Look at the screen shot.
    13·1 answer
  • U.s. history unit 4 -world war 2
    11·1 answer
  • The Southern economy was based on agriculture. The Northern Economy was base don trade and manufacturing
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!