This is basically a play or drama written by a man named Schiller in 1804
<span>D. an unofficial competition between different departments of NASA to develop new space technology
</span>
Hey there!
I believe these are the followings:
The defendant pleads guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
<span>The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law. </span>
<span>The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode. </span>
<span>The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
</span>
The statement that is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode is that the teacher testified that Goode would not break the law
Hope this helps!:)
Answer:
No, they would not have been able to legalize recreational marihuana.
Explanation:
This is because, in an unitary system, administrative divisions like Georgia or Colorado have very few powers, and certainly, they do not have any legislative powers.
All legislation emerges from the central government in an unitary system, and this means that if the U.S. was an unitary system, the law to legalize recreational marihuana would have to come, exclusively, from the U.S. Congress.
Unless the U.S. Congress legalized marihuana nationwide, no state would be allowed to do so under an unitary system. it would continue to be prohibited.
Answer:
100 years
Explanation:
All the ruling houses have a span of over 100 years. A interval spacing of just 5, 10, or 20 years would be a waste considering how long these time periods are.
