Answer:
B) We would know Mrs. Mallard's thoughts about her husband's death.
Explanation:
The given story is written from the third-person point of view. We can recognize this type of narrative by the use of pronouns<em> he, she, it, </em>and <em>they</em>. It feels as if the narrator is a person observing what is going on and telling us about it.
The first-person point of view is the one told from the first person. We can recognize this by the use of pronouns <em>I </em>and <em>we</em>. The narrator is one of the characters from the story, usually the main character.
If Mrs. Mallard was the narrator, we would know her thoughts about her husband's death. We would be looking at the events that take place around her through her eyes. We would know what she is thinking about and how exactly she is feeling. This is the effect of the first-person narrative.
People have been using the milk that cows produce for hundreds of years. For generations, people milked cows by hand. Generally, they could milk six cows per hour. However, once machines came along, they changed the dairy industry. Some people think milking by machine seems mean or cold. But today’s milking process is superior.
During the revision process, the writer will most likely improve the argument by adding which sentence at the end?
A. Refrigeration started in 1880, making milk more available.
<u>B. Today's farm machines can milk more than 100 cows an hour.
</u>
C. The majority of farms today are still owned and run by families.
D. "We've had a dairy cow for years," local farmer Pat Cooper said.
Answer is BLIND “ LOVE IS BLIND”
The author word choice of using words like ardour and avidity made it clear that the gentleman got very much pleasure reading based on the definitions of the two words. In fact, it's not a great stretch to say he had an addiction since it got in the way of his basic needs which is what the first sentence was basically shouting at the reader. My interpretation is that the man was to much in his thoughts to take care of himself. From that I concluded that him trying to understand the absolute meaning of Don Belianis broke his fragile state; the only thing that keep the gentleman going was his joyful understanding of complex books, but he couldn't understand a author of a great book's writing.
