Answer:
Antifederalists argued that in a state of nature people were entirely free. In society some rights were yielded for the common good. But, there were some rights so fundamental that to give them up would be contrary to the common good. These rights, which should always be retained by the people, needed to be explicitly stated in a bill of rights that would clearly define the limits of government. A bill of rights would serve as a fire bell for the people, enabling them to immediately know when their rights were threatened.
Additionally, some Antifederalists argued that the protections of a bill of rights was especially important under the Constitution, which was an original compact with the people. State bills of rights offered no protection from oppressive acts of the federal government because the Constitution, treaties and laws made in pursuance of the Constitution were declared to be the supreme law of the land. Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights.
Explanation: i hope this helps some
Answer:
<em><u>Democrats </u></em>favored Bimetallism and their candidate was <em><u>William Jennings Bryan</u></em>
Explanation:
Bimetallism is monetary policy in which the value of a currency is dependent on two valuable metals instead of one. E.g. Instead of simply pegging a currency with the price of gold, it can be done with gold and silver.
In fact, from the very early years, Gold and Silver were legal tenders in the country but was completely abolished by 1873.
William Jennings Bryan was a famous Democrat who believed that Bimetallism should be brought back to the country for more economic stability,
The answer is b(I hope so)
Answer:
Socialists pushed for general social equality while Labor unions focused on workers' rights
Explanation:
<u><em>Hope this Helps! Please Mark Brainliest!</em></u>
Answer:
B. Though the United States eventually abolished slavery, fierce
regional disagreements about the system kept it in place
throughout much of the century.
Explanation:
During the 18th and 19th centuries, the agency maintained a strong position. Before the Civil War, slavery was a very profitable enterprise, especially rooted in the south. When the civil war ended and slavery was abolished, most southern states struggled to maintain it. The resistance of this southern slavery completely freed slavery and their desire to lead them to new parts of the country created an atmosphere of separation between the north and the south after the civil war.
