<span>He definitely wasn't a failure: he captained what became arguably the most famous voyage in the history of seafaring. True, he wasn't the first European to visit America (the Vikings were), but his journey opened up the East and the West and ushered in the modern era. That isn't something a failure could do.
But he certainly wasn't a hero, either. He was a ruthless and cruel man who inflicted unspeakable tortures upon innocent natives after he arrived in America.
He was neither a failure, nor a hero. He was a very succesful man who was also a horrible person.</span>
Answer:
c. Winchester Model 1873
Explanation:
doesn't exactly need an explanation does it?
C. Cannons and automatic rifles
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. Chamberlain and Nehru both appeal to the economic interests of their audience, but Chamberlain is appealing to a desire for power, while Nehru is appealing to a sense of social justice.</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From the above passage it is evident that Chamberlain has failed to comprehend a united India, while on the other hand Nehru is more focused on delivering social justice to each and everyone. It is evident that Chamberlain has a pessimistic tone about the entire concept of “unity in diversity”. He believed that it was a utopian idea to unite a nation that’s so diverse and in pieces. On the other hand Nehru believed in this very utopian idea of one nation.
