Answer:
No
Explanation:
Can an action force exist without a reaction force? No. Every force is an interaction involving a pair of forces. A single force doesn't exist.
Look at Newton's law
Work much and much harder, to get up, their income. Because no one would like a horrible worker at their place, if you have hat, I would suggest you to start making good work for your boss.
Hope that this helps you..
Answer:
It's TRUE
Explanation:
Totalitarianism is a political regime in which the government is authoritarian, nationalist, anti-democratic, and militaristic. The State has enormous powers that encompass all sectors of citizens' lives, including education, leisure, and the exercise of citizenship.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
