Probably what the authors opinion of the statement is. Or what he think is right and which side the author relies on and which side they disagree with. Those evidence are based on their opinion and ones thoughts please consider brainliest
Answer:
This would have been an excellent opportunity to load up his camels, no longer carrying their burdens of gold, with salt.
Explanation:
If you think about it, he could have gathered his things up.
Answer:
1. Doctor : You should take this medicine every day.
Patient : Should I take it before dinner or after dinner?
Doctor : No, you should take it after breakfast.
The Doctor advised the patient that (a) he should take the medicine every day. The patient further asked (b) if he should take it before or after dinner.The doctor replied negatively and then said (c) that he should take it after breakfast.
2. Teacher : Children, let us all pledge to save trees.
Children : Yes, Mam, we all pledge to save our trees as the trees are the lungs of the city.
Teacher : Let us start today by planting a sapling.
The teacher asked all the children to pledge to save trees. The children replied affirmatively (a) that they pledge to save their trees as the (b) lungs of the city. Then the teacher said that (c)they would start by planting a sapling.
Answer:
The Dust Bowl was a devestating event in American History. The Dust Bowl was a period of time when dust covered multiple regions of the United states but eventually effected the entire country. The Dust Bowl survivors fled to the city of California to escape the dust in their hometowns. The survivors were viewied diffrently by the residents of California. Some viewed the survivors as refugees struglling to live while others viewed them as intruders competing for land and jobs in california.
The Dust Bowl started in 1930 when severe drought started to hit the regions and in 1931 massive dust storms began to happen. By 1934 an estimated 35 million acres of formerly cultivated land had been rendered useless for farming, while another 125 million acres was rapidly losing its topsoil. The Dust killed many livestock and other animals that got in its way. The people living in the Dust Bowl areas were starting to escape the dust and go to California to start a new life. The citizens of California had diffrent viewpoints towards the survivors. Some viewed them as intruders competing for land and wealth in California while other viewed them as refugees escaping a natural disaster that they had no control over. The survivors just wanted to live in peace and make a living in california. The survivors were refugees because they just wanted to survive and if they had the intention to make money and be wealthy they would have done that before the Dust Bowl occured.
The Dust Bowl was a devestating event in the US history that affected all of the US. The survivors of the dust bowl were refugees with no intention of getting rich hoping to live and survive.
Explanation: Got a 100 on this
Answer:
The prejudice shown is making a sexist remark against the female gender.
The line "Women don't know the offside rule" shows how sexist the comment is.
Explanation:
A sexist remark is when a person of one gender says something discriminatory about a person of another gender. This means that talking bad about the other based on her gender is known or taken as a sexist comment or discrimination based on one's gender.
In the given scenario of the sports presenters, their comment about Sian Massey's 'incapability' to be a referee, based on her being a woman is a sexist remark. They are making the claim that Sian was not worthy to be a referee for the game because of her gender and that women don't know anything about <em>"offside rule"</em> which is discriminatory in nature.
This claim can be supported by the very comment <em>"Can you believe that? A female linesman. Women don't know the offside rule."</em>
