Answer:
A. The French and Dutch relied heavily on trade alliances with Native Americans, while the Spanish did not.
Explanation:
In the paragraph it follows that Samuel de Champlain who was a French explorer, talks about his contact with the Algonquians in a positive and friendly way. He speaks of friendship, of joint coexistence and of trade in techniques as well as providing settlers with part of what the natives hunt in exchange for goods that the French can give in return to the natives.
This differs from the approach of the Spaniards who, although they initially traded small quantities of objects such as mirrors for gold ornaments, focused solely on the exploitation and use of natives for their own gains, forced conversion and slavery.
The answer is operant conditioning
hope it helps!!!
Answer:
critical thinking.
Explanation:
Critical thinking -
It is the method by which a proper analysis of any fact or activity is done before final judgement , is referred to as critical thinking.
In this method , the people tries to refer to every possible aspect of the fcat or activity , to have a wider angle of thinking.
Critical thinking is self-corrective thinking , self-disciplined and self-directed.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The correct term is critical thinking.
Yes, because since he enunciated the act he should be proud of the outcome, especially in today's society now
in the blank you would put “conflicts with”
