1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
2 years ago
11

Do you

History
1 answer:
vazorg [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, In my opinion Great Britain had the right to expect Americans to help pay the cost of the French and Indian  War because Great Britain are the owner of the southern colonies in the land of America and the Americans that lives there are the citizens of Great Britain so as a citizen of the state, they have the responsibility to help its country in the time of wars and pay taxes to fulfill the cost of the French and Indian  War.

You might be interested in
Based on this excerpt, what can you infer about
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

He was willing to trade the Sudetenland to maintain the peace.

Explanation:

Chamberlain wanted to appease for Germany, as he believed Britain had a big enough of a loss from WWI that he was willing to do anything, including trading Sudetenland, to maintain peace.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
TRUE OR FALSE:the rising stock market helped working class Americans save money.
Anna11 [10]

False. The stock market crash devastated & wiped out millions of investors.

Hope this helps!

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who lead Muslim troops in their fight to take back Jerusalem in 1187?
enyata [817]

<span>The Muslim troops were under the leadership of Salah ad-Din (Saladin) an Ayyubid sultan. They had murdered and enslaved many Crusaders which made the Muslims a great military power in Jersualem, the Holy Land. They had also captured other cities which sparked what was then known as the ‘Third Crusade’.</span>

5 0
3 years ago
National Security: the colonized island country has deepwater ports for refueling the mother country's navy and merchant marine.
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

Imperialism is never justified.

Explanation:

In the question above we see that there is a country that has deep water ports and an airfield. These two factors are elements that generate wealth for that country and that belongs to the national territory. In this case, it is not justified that another country, out of greed, uses its influence and strength to dominate these elements through imperialism, exploiting foreign wealth for its own growth, while the country that owns that wealth is devalued.

6 0
2 years ago
I was in history and we were talking about this court think i dont remember much but i took one look at the picture of the jury
nikitadnepr [17]
Answer= Good one ! ☀︎︎シ
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the Roman Inquisition of 1616 imply regarding the heliocentric theory?
    11·2 answers
  • Why were absolute monarchies more common Eastern Europe than in Western Europe? (5 points)
    10·1 answer
  • What is a slave narrative?
    6·1 answer
  • What economic impact did the first world war have on India
    12·1 answer
  • hich answer supports the statement, "The state constitution is more detailed than the U.S. Constitution"? A) The U.S. Constituti
    5·2 answers
  • What is written on the base of the Statue of Liberty?
    11·1 answer
  • Which argument did the opponents of the constitution make during the ratification process
    11·1 answer
  • ITS NOT B please explain​
    15·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me?<br><br>What are the two events in 1773 that led to the Boston Tea Party?​
    8·1 answer
  • What aspect of Chinese history has been a long standing feature?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!