1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
9

Was it possible to have a peaceful reconciliation after the Civil War?

History
1 answer:
Mariana [72]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It was definitely possible to have a peace of reconciliation after the Civil War, just not immediately afterwards. Directly after the war, the South was destroyed, their cities burned, their economy in ruins. After rebuilding, they could rejoin the Union and have peace with their Northern counterparts.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Discuss the significance of the similarity between the two battles.
Alecsey [184]
The difference between this battle and the battle with Grendel is that in the battle with Grendel, Beowulf didn’t want to use weapons whereas with Grendel’smother, Beowulf used his weapons. Also when fighting with Grendel, Beowulf was the only one fighting and with Grendel’s mother, the other warriors were helping.
8 0
3 years ago
The goal of William Lloyd Garrison’s The Liberator was to
Greeley [361]
<span>The goal of William Lloyd Garrison's The Liberator was to build public support for the abolition of slavery. Garrison spent most of his life fighting against slavery. He was dedicated to his cause and this made him one of the most famous abolitionists in the US.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mariarad [96]

Answer:

thats so hard

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 17 (5 points)
ololo11 [35]
Louis Armstrong is considered a jazz legend for <span>his ability to play the trumpet and subtle sense of improvisation.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following correctly describes the difference in Francis Bacon and René Descartes' approach to science?
natka813 [3]

Rene Descartes is frequently considered the first modern philosopher. His first publication, Discourse on Method (1637), was the touchstone of the scientific method. A response to the lack of clarity he saw in the world of science, Discourse describes how scientific study should be prosecuted so as to achieve the utmost clarity, by using deductive reasoning to test hypotheses. Descartes explained that the test of an alleged truth is the clarity with which it may be apprehended, or proven. "I think, therefore I am," (cogito ergo sum) is Descartes' famous example of the most clearly apprehended truth. In effect, the evidence of thought proves the hypothesis of existence.


Descartes dabbled extensively in the study of cosmology and the nature of matter, developing theories on the make up of matter and the formulation and operation of heavenly bodies. Though Descartes' astronomical explanation failed to account for many observed phenomena, his great prestige propelled his theory into fashion among the educated elite intellectuals of Europe. Descartes was even about to publish a book on cosmology, entitled The World, in 1653, when he heard of Galileo Galilei's condemnation by the Church and thought better of it. Descartes tried to apply his physical theories and expand upon them in his works on human anatomy, which, though pioneering in some respects, were largely erroneous. He further wrote about the spiritual nature of man and theorized about the existence of the soul. The Cartesian philosophy (derived from his name, Descartes) won many followers during the seventeenth century.


Francis Bacon, also called Lord Verulam, was somewhat less renowned and less successful than Descartes, but nevertheless highly influential. Bacon advocated the collection of all possible facts and phenomena and the processing of these through a sort of automatic logical mill. Bacon warned scientists against four famous false notions, called Idols.


1. Idols of the Tribe were fallacies in humankind, most notably man's proneness to believe that nature was ordered to a higher degree than it actually was.


2. Idols of the Cave were misconceptions inherent in individuals' thoughts, spawned by private prejudices.


3. Idols of the Marketplace were errors that arose from received systems of thought.


1 2

PREVIOUS


THE NEW ASTRONOMY (1510-1600)NEXT


ADVANCEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS (1591-1655)


Video SparkNotes: Joseph Conrad's…

‹ Previous Next ›  

More

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one of the fads of the 1920s?
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement from Martin Luther's 95 Theses do you feel had the greatest impact on the Protestant Reformation? Explain your r
    10·1 answer
  • What is an amphibious assault?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the goal of Thur good Marshall and the naacp in the case of brown v.board of education
    13·2 answers
  • By the 1970s, what were some effects of the move to liberalism? Check all that apply. Both crime and poverty rates had greatly i
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following made it possible for scientists to practice direct observation​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did Bessie refused to accept the limitations people placed on her?
    14·1 answer
  • What are some different opinions or ideas that people have about racism and bullying?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the geography and climate of the Indian subcontinent influence the development of early civilizations there?
    11·1 answer
  • The Warsaw Pact sought to
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!