Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Which of the following is an example of nationalism?
Option choices:
A. a leader calls on his country's allies to protect his country from a threat posed by another country.
B. under an alliance, one country promises to defend another country from an attack by a third.
C. one country declares war on another country after that country attacks the first country's ally.
D. an activist organizes a protest of ethnic minorities in a country to demand that they be given their own country.
brainly.com/question/3853496
Answer:
Explanation:
If you're referring to regulations:
There is a maximum amount of money individuals and organizations can send directly to candidates (HARD MONEY)
A way to bypass this is if you send money to a political party which then runs ads for campaigns
Example; You already contributed your maximum $5,000 to the Trump Campaign but you want to contribute $20,000 in total so you give the Republican Party $15,000.
Also no foreign money is allowed in political elections.
At night, if you leave a brightly lit place, you should Drive slowly until your eyes adjust to the darkness.
Explanation:
<u>The Traffic death rate at night is three times greater at Night.</u>
<u>The vision of the person driving at night is limited(Due to the limitation of the peripheral vision),Fatigue(dull concentration and slow reaction time) is another reason that adds on to risk of night driving</u>
The National Safety Council,
has issued certain guidelines for night driving:
- Low beam lights to be used when following others at night.
- High Beam light to be used when driving on open highways or rural areas.
- <u>When leaving a brightly lit place,drive slowly until your vision adjust to the darknes</u>s.
- Dim high beam light at-least from a distance of 500ft from an oncoming vehicle.
Answer is (C) Drive slowly until your eyes adjust to the darkness.
.
Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).
Explanation: :)
