1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
10

REVIEW QUESTION: Identify two ways a literary analysis and argumentative essay are similar.

English
1 answer:
Art [367]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A) They are both written with a formal tone

C) They are both written to get the other side to see where you are coming from with your ideas.

Explanation:

An argumentative essay is written in order to bring new information that would convince an audience about something, while literary analysis on the other hand is the comparison of style, language, diction, etc of an article to show the context of the article.

Therefore, the two ways a literary analysis and argumentative essay are similar are they are both written in a formal tone and they are both written to get the other side to see where you are coming from with your ideas.

You might be interested in
What does uptight mean?
daser333 [38]
Uptight means: angry, stressed, sassy. 
5 0
4 years ago
Read this line from Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson's "Memorial Day" speech. We do not answer him—we do not answer those who li
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

He asks for justice and tell him to give us more time.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
English Class 10
Lynna [10]
<h2>Required Answer : - </h2>

The poet brings about the contrast between the ice

and <u>hatred</u> through the poem “Fire and Ice”.

<h3>Additional information :- </h3>

  • The name of the poem is Fire and Ice. In this poem, you find the realist side of the poet’s nature. He has perceived the nature of humans and described it perfectly in the poem using simple words. According to him, humanity has been engrossed by never-ending desire and hunger for power. It is because of this greed, humanity will end in two ways. The poet has mentioned that the entire human race will end either in flames or being engulfed by ice. The poem has only a few lines but manages to describe what the poet wants to convey to his readers perfectly.

  • To understand the inner meaning of the poem, you need to refer to the Summary of Fire and Ice Class 10 English. This summary has been prepared by the mentors of Vedantu so that students can understand the hidden context of the poem. Refer to this summary to prepare the chapter well and answer the question easily in exams to score better.

  • History is evidence of the downfall of many civilizations due to wars. Wars are the effect of hatred, greed and the never-ending desires of the human race. Robert Frost, one of the eminent poets, had perceived that humans will be responsible for their own catastrophe. They will be annihilated from the surface of the earth because of their negative emotions controlled by greed and hatred.

  • The poet is sure of the destruction of the human race. He is sure that it will happen very soon. The nature of humans makes them weaker and they fall prey to the hands of greed, hatred and desire. The more they get, the more they want. They also want what others have. This unending desire is lethal for the future of humans. A time will come when the entire race will cease to exist as humans will destroy themselves using fire or ice.

  • The evil desires will control humans to make and launch destructive weapons against each other. A humongous fire will engulf the entire race killing everyone and making earth sane again. According to the Short Summary of Fire and Ice Class 10 English, the poet has found a remarkable similarity between the fire of evil desires and hatred and the fire that destroys life.

  • He also depicts another reason for the destruction of the human race. He believes that the world created by humans will be destroyed by ice someday. Ice is compared as an uncompassionate feeling of the humans for each other. Nobody cares about what is happening in the world because of their . It seems that the ice of these evil emotions has made humans go numb. They fail to feel any warmth and are slowly losing the hope to survive without knowing it. Humans act cruelly against each other and do not think twice before imparting harm.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

<h3>Hope it's helps !! </h3>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does Machiavelli support his claim that rulers can be cruel if it benefits their subjects and is necessary for security?
RideAnS [48]

Read the passage from chapter 8 of The Prince.

Agathocles, the Sicilian, became King of Syracuse not only from a private but from a low and abject position. This man, the son of a potter, through all the changes in his fortunes always led an infamous life.

Nevertheless, he accompanied his infamies with so much ability of mind and body that, having devoted himself to the military profession, he rose through its ranks to be Praetor of Syracuse.

Being established in that position, and having deliberately resolved to make himself prince and to seize by violence, without obligation to others, that which had been conceded to him by assent, he came to an understanding for this purpose with Amilcar, the Carthaginian, who, with his army, was fighting in Sicily.

One morning he assembled the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had to discuss with them things relating to the Republic, and at a given signal the soldiers killed all the senators and the richest of the people; these dead, he seized and held the princedom of that city without any civil commotion. . . .

How does Machiavelli support his claim that rulers can be cruel if it benefits their subjects and is necessary for security?

Machiavelli uses anecdotal evidence through historical examples to support his claim.

Machiavelli uses empirical evidence about politics and society to support his claim.

Machiavelli uses logical evidence through historical examples to support his claim.

Machiavelli uses empirical and logical evidence to support his claim.

Answer:

Machiavelli uses logical evidence through historical examples to support his claim.

Explanation:

Machiavelli supports his claim that rulers can be cruel if it benefits their subjects and is necessary for security by using logical evidence through historical examples to support his claim.

Machiavelli made use of logic through historical examples to support his claim by the use of inference and premise to support his claim that rulers can be cruel if it benefits their subjects and is necessary for security.

He made use of Agathocles, King of Syracuse to make his point.

*Logic is the systematic study of valid rules of inference

5 0
3 years ago
26. The Ming ruled China from 1368 to 1644.
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

maybe simple subject or simple predicate

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hillarie is creating a webpage about the Amazon River. Which information would be most useful for her to add next to the image?
    14·2 answers
  • What skills do you think need to improve as a student
    12·1 answer
  • “Give me a morsel, friend. You’re hardly the worst
    7·1 answer
  • Who among Victor’s influences would be considered alchemists? Select all that apply. 
    12·1 answer
  • A car battery that is low on water will not deliver enough current to start your car. The average life expectancy of a vehicle b
    14·1 answer
  • Which answer best describes Jim’s mother in comparison to the mothers in the
    6·1 answer
  • So, i am doing a project on 'freedom from fear' in my English class. I have to read “THE FOUR FREEDOMS” by FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT
    10·1 answer
  • What is a good summary for Martin Luther King speech
    14·1 answer
  • In the great gatsby, which of these best explains why gatsby represents a paradox
    7·1 answer
  • Despite the strong temptation to become
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!