Answer:
Passage with highlighting group, passage without highlighting group
Explanation:
A researcher randomly assigns participants to read a passage in a book with or without highlighting in the passage. Differences in comprehension are compared between groups. The <u>passage with highlighting group</u> is the experimental group and the <u>passage without highlighting group</u> is the control group in this example.
The group that is subject to the treatment is the experimental group, while the group that is not subject to the treatment is the control group.
the 19 amendment...women's rights.
1st amendment...freedom of speech
Answer
bounded rationality
Explanation
Bounded rationality is a natural assessment related to thinking and decision making. Bounded rationality is related to the complex and limited decision making in the hand of the worker. There are a limited time, limited information and limited decision available for the worker. In bounded rationality, the person has both rational and irrational thoughts.
Thus in the above statement, Melissa is facing the situation of rationally bounded because she feels so complex and limited in making a decision. She faces this situation consistently at her workplace.
The confounding variable that makes the conclusion inappropriate are the parents who choose the learning tools that they want their children to use.
<h3>What is a confounding variable?</h3>
A confounding variable is a variable that makes it difficult to establish the true relationship that exists between two variables.
Read more on confounding variables here:
brainly.com/question/24321245?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
b. will not grant the warrant because it is too general
Explanation:
According to the Fourth Amendment, warrants for search must be given with probable cause and if there is no probable cause, granting such warrant will be unconstitutional.
