Wasn't original to the Constitution
In McCullough v. Maryland (1891), the US Congress defined the scope of legislative power. During this monumental case, the Supreme Court found that Congress had “implied powers” (powers not expressly listed in the Constitution) and that the Necessary and Proper Clause gave them the power to establish a National Bank.
President Jackson did not agree because he felt the finding was unconstitutional and had the ability to greatly overpower the federal government. Jackson vetoed the bill refusing to acknowledge warnings that doing so would threaten his re-election chances.
The answer I believe is D) The loss of healthy young men during World Wars I and II created an excess of healthy, marriageable young women.
The Intolerable Acts not only attacked the economic rights of people in the Massachusetts colony, but also removed their system of self-rule and representative government. The Intolerable Acts closed the port of Boston to imports and exports, appointed a military governor, barred town meetings, and prevented the election of local officials and the selection of jurors. Although colonists viewed earlier tax acts and acts to control trade as unconstitutional, this act actually deprived them of their civil rights. The Magna Carta and British Bill of Rights of 1689 indicate that the King is not above the law, and that certain civil rights are granted to British subjects to ensure that the King does not become to powerful. Among these rights are the right to trial by a jury of one's peers, and the power of taxation resting in the hands of an elected body. Both of these rights were removed with the tax act. The colonists had no form of economic or political defense against the King's absolute rule in Massachusetts.
It is the South Korea's lawmaking body that recently voted to impeach president park geun-hye over a corruption scandal. <span>The 300-member National Assembly is expected to vote on the impeachment bill. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
