All categories

3 years ago

Pleaaasseee help!!! BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!! What is the transformation rule for a translation 3 units right?

Mathematics

1 answer:

garri49 [273]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Rule: replace x by x - a where a is the number of units that you want to move right. a must be greater than 0. x - - a would move left.

Step-by-step explanation:

You want f(x) to move 3 units to the right.

That would mean that x would be replaced by x - 3. Just to be sure let's try it.

Suppose you have f(x) = x^2 + 6x + 5 It is graphed as the red line
Now suppose you want to move 3 units right.
It would replaced like f(x - 3) = (x - 3)^2 + 6(x - 3) + 5 which is the blue line
Notice nothing else is changed. The blue line looks exactly like the red line except that it is shifted 3 units to the right.

You might be interested in

What is an equivalent ratio to 3/5?

Elza [17]

Answer:

6/10

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 3/5 by any whole number ratio equal to 1 to obtain an equivalent fraction.

(2/2)*(3/5) = 6/10

or (3/3)*(2/5) = 9/15

etc.

3 0

3 years ago

If tan 0 = -2.5, then cot 0 =<br> = ?

trapecia [35]

The answer shld be 0.99

4 0

3 years ago

Consider the following operations on the number 8.82 x 10^-2. Without using a calculator, decide which would give a significantl

Ksenya-84 [330]

Correct question is;

Consider the following operations on the number 8.85 x 10^(-2). Without using a calculator, decide which would give a significantly smaller value than 8.85 x 10^(-2), which would give a significantly larger value, or which would give essentially the same value.

A) 8.85 × 10^(-2) + 6.69 × 10^(5)

B) 8.85 x 10^(-2) - 6.69 x 10^(5)

C) 8.85 x 10^(-2) x 6.69 x 10^(5)

D) 8.85 × 10^(-2) ÷ 6.69 × 10^(5)

Answer:

Option A & B yield essentially the same value.

Option C yields a significantly smaller value

Option D yields a significantly larger value

Step-by-step explanation:

Since given value for the operations is in 10^(-2) indices, then let's convert the operations numbers from 10^(5) indices to 10^(-2).

Thus;

6.69 × 10^(5) = (6.69 × 10^(-7)) × 10^(-2)

Thus;

A) 8.85 × 10^(-2) + 6.69 × 10^(5) is now;

8.85 × 10^(-2) + ((6.69 × 10^(-7)) × 10^(-2))

This gives;

[8.85 + (6.69 × 10^(-7))] × 10^(-2)

The 10^(-7) indices indicates that the initial value of 8.85 × 10^(-2) would not change much and would essentially be the same

B) 8.85 x 10^(-2) - 6.69 x 10^(5) is now;

8.85 × 10^(-2) - ((6.69 × 10^(-7)) × 10^(-2))

This gives;

[8.85 - (6.69 × 10^(-7))] × 10^(-2)

Again the 10^(-7) indices indicates that the initial value of 8.85 × 10^(-2) would not change much and would essentially be the same.

C) 8.85 x 10^(-2) x 6.69 x 10^(5) is now;

(8.85 × 10^(-2)) × ((6.69 × 10^(-7)) × 10^(-2))

This gives;

[8.85 × (6.69 × 10^(-7))] × 10^(-2)

When we multiply 8.85 by 6.69 × 10^(-7), the value gotten will be way lower than the initial value of 8.85.

Thus,this operation will give a significantly smaller value.

D) (8.85 × 10-2) ÷ (6.69 × 10^5) is now;

(8.85 × 10^(-2)) ÷ ((6.69 × 10^(-7)) × 10^(-2))

This gives;

[8.85 ÷ (6.69 × 10^(-7))] × 10^(-2)

When we carry out the operation:

8.85 ÷ (6.69 × 10^(-7)), it is essentially equal to (8.85 × 10^(7))/6.69.

This means that the new value would be significantly larger than the initial value of 8.85.

Thus,this operation yields a significantly larger value.

4 0

3 years ago

Find an equation of the line that has undefined slope and contains the point left parenthesis negative 1 comma 6 right parenthes

Rudiy27

When the slope isn't defined, it's not possible to write the line in slope-intercept form. No slope means a vertical line, which here must be

$x= -1$

The ordered pair (-1,6) obviously satisfies the above equation so is on the vertical line $x=-1$ .

6 0

3 years ago

Find the Area of RQP

zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer: 25 units squared

Step-by-step explanation:

Draw a line down from p and go right connecting to r. The units there are equal to the ones on the triangle you were given. 5 horizontally and 10 vertically. 5 times 10 is 50 divided by 2

3 0

3 years ago