1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
3 years ago
6

How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 affect the Cherokee people? OA. It forced them to move from their home in the Appalachian

Mountains to land west of the Mississippi River. OB. It forced them to flee to Canada to avoid being moved from their home in Oregon to land in Oklahoma. OC. It allowed them to force American settlers to leave Native American land. OD. it allowed them to take Native American children out of American schools. ​
History
2 answers:
Sonbull [250]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It forced them to move from their home in the Appalachian Mountains to land west of the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It forced them to move from their home in the Appalachian Mountains to land west of the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In 1534, French explorer Jacques Cartier explored the St. Lawrence River and claimed the area for France. This area became part
andrew11 [14]
Idek idek idekdnwjcjkdcjwkcjnwnfjefnkegnndjd
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
2 years ago
What were the leading Democratic nations following the first World War?
dem82 [27]

Answer:

Answer. The irony of Wilson's quote is that WWI did not directly make the world safe for democracy. In fact WWI directly led to the rise of state socialism in the former Russian Empire with its evolution into the USSR, and the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany. ... So WWI helped secure the communist victory in Russia.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What conditions prevented Cortés from defeating the Aztecs in 1519 but enabled him to prevail in 1521
kolbaska11 [484]
Competing conquistadors arrived and fighting broke out which killed half the Spanish in 1519. Then later in 1521 European diseases killed most of the Natives which allowed Cortes to lead a brutal attack and succeed. 
8 0
3 years ago
4. Why did Mayor William Alvord veto the Pigtail Ordinance?
lakkis [162]

Answer:

The Pigtail Ordinance was an 1873 law intended to force prisoners in San Francisco, California to have their hair cut within an inch of the scalp. While the law did not discriminate between races, it affected Han Chinese prisoners in particular, as it meant they would have their queue, a waist-long, braided pigtail, cut off. The proposal passed by a narrow margin through the Board of Supervisors in 1873 but was not enacted until 1876.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which american civilization was on the rise around the same time the western half of the roman empire was taken over by various
    9·2 answers
  • What modern states did 1648 Sweden control
    5·1 answer
  • 3.b How was the Enlightenment similar to the Great Awakening
    10·1 answer
  • Hy did American Indians who lived in dry areas make knives from flint rather than slate?
    7·1 answer
  • Daoism can be summarized by which statement?
    7·1 answer
  • Into what four castes was Hindu society clearly divided?
    10·1 answer
  • What people group was NOT targeted for extermination by the Germans? Homosexuals Gypsies Aryans Handicapped
    12·1 answer
  • The Amendment to the Constitution protects victims of human trafficking.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the gentleman’s agreements of 1907
    6·2 answers
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!