Judicial restraint is a position that judges adopt when they purposely limit the exercise of their power. Judicial restraint judges make a cautious approach of their interpretation of laws, normally taking a very conservative position, instead of making decisions that could be considered as controversial. Judicial restraint is the opposite of judicial activism.
For example, a judicial restraint judge is in charge of sentencing a criminal for attempting to rob a bank. He or she revises previous cases and will probably make a sentence of similar proportions to the criminal, basing his or her decision on past sentences.
B. Male voters had a greater effect on election votes
Hope this helps!
Answer:
mongols hahahahahahaha Sana maka help
Hey was a bad person and people didn't like him
You too!! Your so sweet thank oh very much!! Hope your day is going well!
