Answer:
I would dsicontinue the use of polygraph machines because they are only 50% accurate
Explanation:
Answer:
The exclusionary rule
Explanation:
the decision in Mappy v. Ohio declared that evidence that is obtained through an illegal search or seizure can not be used as evidence and must be excluded. This means that if an officer finds evidence of a crime on you but does not announce Miranda rights before searching you, then the evidence found from your crime can not be used against you in a court.
A major strength that came with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was that the Federal government did not need a claim to be brought to enforce civil rights legislation so this is <u>True</u>.
<h3>What did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 do?</h3>
It made it a federal crime to discriminate against people based on demographic factors such as color, race and religion.
Because such discrimination became a federal crime, the federal government now had to right to enforce civil rights legislation without people bringing claims because they were simply enforcing the law.
Find out more on the Civil Rights Act at brainly.com/question/1261890.
Answer: All 6 will go to the Democratic candidate
Explanation:
Even though there is no Constitutional basis, states usually give all their electoral votes to the candidate with the majority vote in their state. Mississippi is one of those states.
So long as a candidate receives the majority of the votes, they will get all 6 of Mississippi electoral votes. For instance, Senator McCain won 724,597 votes to Obama's 554,662 in 2008 and thus got all 6 electoral votes.
The Democratic candidate here will therefore receive all 6 electoral votes.
