1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
13

What are the standard procedures for collecting and handling evidence? (How is it labeled and packaged?)

Law
1 answer:
Alecsey [184]3 years ago
7 0

When collecting evidence, the examiner must wear gloves at all times and change them often utilizing the clean technique.

<u>Explanation:</u>

According to the rule of law, the evidence is considered to be the most important one in the prosecution. So, much care to be given while collecting the evidence.

The standard procedure for collecting the evidence are, first it must be identified from the place of crime or an appropriate place where the crime took place, for collecting the evidence pair of gloves should be used for each and every time and it should be changed frequently to use the clean technique.

After proper collection of evidence; labelling and packaging is most important. The evidence should not be packed in plastic pouches because of moisture the finger print will vanish.

So, proper paper bags or paper should be used for wrapping the evidence and  labelled according to the date on which it is collected and place, time and numbering of evidence are used for sealing it.  

You might be interested in
Which success factor or reward of IS implementation enables you to see the real-time status or availability of a process or prod
Elis [28]
The answer would be A :)
4 0
3 years ago
What is the final step of any historical research project?
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

I know someone that has the answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suzy loaded her .38 caliber pistol, snuck out the back door, and, unknown to Bob, with finger on the trigger aimed directly at h
Rudik [331]

Answer:

Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.

Explanation:

Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.

This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.

7 0
3 years ago
These courts derive their power from the constitution and federal laws. True or False
PolarNik [594]
The answer is true because without the constitution no branch of the gov would have power actually
3 0
3 years ago
I’m sooooooooooooooooooooo confused
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Public morals

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to von Hetig, which category of crime victims is the most likely to be victimized?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the goverment put out untested nicotine devices
    6·1 answer
  • Wh1th09h.Ch03.05
    7·1 answer
  • Is popular sovereignty important to a republic? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • Commercial Law definition ​
    13·1 answer
  • 2. A study of plaque buildup on teeth used three randomly
    12·1 answer
  • The process shown in this diagram affected which outcome?
    11·1 answer
  • What U.S. economic measurement “shrank” from $21.4 trillion in 2019 to $20.9 trillion in 2020 as a result of the coronavirus pan
    9·1 answer
  • Negative impact of crime prevention through environmental design​
    15·1 answer
  • The right to information act came into force in.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!