1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
2 years ago
6

Please answer and just give one piece of evidence as to why. Just an example

History
1 answer:
xenn [34]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

marshall believed in a strong commitment to judicial power and a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures (federalist views) hamilton was a federalist as well so hamilton would be more supportive of john marshall's views.

You might be interested in
Why are Homer’s The Iliad and the Odyssey significant pieces of literature? *
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Because of President Clinton’s economic plan, in 1999,
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

Option A, The federal budget had a surplus.

Explanation:

e2020 ✌

7 0
3 years ago
The idea if "natural rights" means that
Setler [38]
The answer is a).

Natural rights are rights that people have under" natural" law- inherently, and not because it was given to them by the government.
7 0
3 years ago
Dans un développement construit d’une vingtaine de lignes, montrez l’importance des mers et océans pour le commerce maritime ain
saul85 [17]

Answer:

Both are very important for trade.

Explanation:

Seas and oceans are very important for maritime trade because trading through seas and oceans are less costly for the countries. There are big ships  which can be used for trade purpose between different countries. For trading by sea and ocean, countries built sea ports. The sea and ocean is fragile means easily be damaged. There is a great damage occur to the sea and ocean due to climate change and global warming that disturb the ecosystem and trading routes.

5 0
2 years ago
How did the Supreme Court case, Gibbons v. Ogden, affect interstate commerce?
Juli2301 [7.4K]

It determined that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.

The case of Gibbons v. Ogden regarded the interstate shipping trade and whether or not the states could regulate or if it was Congress's job to regulate.

The decision from the Marshall Court stated it was the job of Congress under the Commerce Clause to regulate trade between states to include shipping. New York was not able to regulate the trade taking place in the waterways between states. One of the justices included in a supporting decision that the federal interstate laws superseded the state laws and the federal government was the ultimate power on interstate trade.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Characteristics of election officers include:
    11·1 answer
  • Define sweatshops. Do these still exist today anywhere in the world?
    8·1 answer
  • Read the following passage from the pool but a sacred text of the Maya civilization about the creation of the earth what main id
    11·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of government?
    7·2 answers
  • After the Germans were stopped at the First Battle of the _____, both sides dug in, and trench lines stretched from _____ to the
    5·2 answers
  • During the late 1800s, the Chinese immigration rate dramatically
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a goal of foreign policy
    6·1 answer
  • Review the amendments in the Bill of rights. Choose three rights to focus on—the rights you believe are the most important ones
    6·1 answer
  • 12. Which of the following is an example of the tensions created by federalism that led to the Civil
    11·1 answer
  • What was the primary focus of the No Child Left Behind Act?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!