Answer:
Counterbalancing
Explanation:
Order effects is known to be the area of order of treatments in the course of an experiment process. Simply put it this way, putting the treatments in a separate order will cause some changes to the results depending on the order of administration of the treatment just as in the case study.
Order effects could be due to probably anything such as fatigue (from one or two tests), practice (familiar with the testing environment boost performance) or varying Testing Conditions (from the testing environment such as heating, lighting, or ergonomics).
Counterbalancing, comes into play in times of all probable treatments being given in all probable orders can regulate for order effects.
Counterbalancing is a procedure used to solve order effects when employing a repetitive process design. With counterbalancing, the participant sample in our case study is grouped in fours using a within-subjects design with four levels to his independent variable. Conner has ¼ of the participants complete each level in ABCD order, a ¼ of participants in BCDA order, a ¼ of participants in CDAB order, and a ¼ of participants in DABC order.
The varying order effects would be compensated for by this procedure.
For within-subjects design, two major counterbalancing techniques would be used involving subject-by-subject counterbalancing, which regulates progressive error for every subject, and across-subjects counterbalancing that evenly spread progressive error over all subjects.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The main reason for this is that the soil would wear out and could no longer support farming. If soil begins to wear out the plants will never grow or die out before reaching full maturity. If the Olmec farmers did not move from time to time their crops would not provide them with the necessary food in order to survive, therefore eventually starving. Their solution to this was moving to locations were the soil could better support their crops and provide larger harvests.
Answer:
Other guy is wrong. This isnt about abortion its about contraception. This is what i found on google.: Supreme Court of the United States
Connecticut Supreme Court reversed. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a landmark case in the United States about access to contraception.
The early political party led by president john Adams represented commercial interests such as merchants and large planters, and supported a strong national government as Federalists.
They desired weaker nation governments, robust centralized authorities, the oblique election of presidency officers, longer term limits for officeholders, and consultant, rather than direct, democracy.
The Federalist birthday celebration turned into a conservative birthday celebration that changed into the first political birthday celebration within the USA. Under Alexander Hamilton, it ruled the countrywide authorities from 1789 to 1801.
Folks that supported the charter and a more potent countrywide republic were referred to as Federalists. Folks that were averse to the ratification of the charter in desire of small localized authorities had been called Anti-Federalists.
Learn more about Federalists here brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ4
