Answer:
Option C. Greenwashing
Explanation:
The reason is that the company has labelled its products with the green technology or environment friendly product, which it is not. So the perception of customers who buy environment friendly products are now not reluctant to purchase the company products who has deceived the people by saying that their product is environment friendly product. So the correct option is option C.
Example:
ExxonMobil in the past has said that it has successfully reduced its green house gas emission but in fact, they increased green house gas emissions in the year. So they were trying to increase their sales by deceiving people that they are moving towards environment friendly operations.
Answer:
The options are not correct:
Dr costs of good sold $15,800
Cr inventory $15,800
Explanation:
The 4,400 units sold consist of the 2,400 units purchased on 1 January at $4.00 per unit and the balance of 2,000 units from the purchase made on January 12 at $3.10 per unit
cost of goods sold=(2,400*$4)+(2,000*$3.10)=$15,800
The cost of goods sold is $15,800 ,neither is it $11,900 nor $11,800
The appropriate entries is to debit costs of good sold with $15,800 while merchandise inventory is credited with $15,800
Answer:
C
Explanation:
An increase in underdeveloped countries cannot be the reason why businesses would expand abroad because there wont be as much potential buyers in underdeveloped economies as they have very low capita income and most of the residents live in very poor conditions. But however other options are valid because favorable trade agreements and developed transportation and IT makes the international trade easy and beneficial to both the buyer and the seller. Moreover, when domestic markets matures, the rate of growth slows down and falls to zero. this is when the businesses want to emerge and find new markets abroad in order to benefit from the trade as in matured market there is less chance for businesses to grow and it becomes risky
Answer:
$5,000 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the total variable overhead variance is given below:
= Budgeted machine hours allowed for actual output × Budgeted variable overhead rate per machine hour - Actual total variable overhead
= 32,000 hours × $2.50 - $75,000
= $80,000 - $75,000
= $5,000 favorable
Since the favorable is more than the actual so it should be favorable
