Answer:
B
Explanation:
Institutional advertising is when your trying to promote a company and not just a product. In example A it is promoting a hand cream. In example C it is promoting a grass seed. and in example D is is promoting the model with more power. Although in example B it gives out the key word Our products meaning that it is talking about the company's products/ company. Thus based on the definition it is B.
Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
- <u><em>Law of demand</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Indeed, the <em>law of demand </em>is that the price and quantity demanded are inversely related. <em>Ceteris paribus</em>, the economist say. It is a latin expression that means "<em>other things equal</em>".
As the resources are, per definition, scarce, the consumers, ecomomic agents who buy the products, need to allocate the money among the different goods and services that the market puts at their disposal.
And they allocate the resources in a intelligent way: they "calculate" the utility of each product considering the cost. If the price increase, the ratio of utility to cost decreases and the consumer will diminish the quantity demanded for that good. If the price decrases, the utility to cost ratio increases and the quantity demanded will increase.
Answer:
Explanation:
X1 X2 Z
0 0 0
16 0 4,000
0 10 3,500
8 6 4,100
check the picture attached for more explanation
Answer: No it is not.
Explanation:
Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.
Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.
This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.
Answer:
Yes, the FTC would ignore the merger and allow it to go through.
Explanation:
here are the options to the question ;
O No, the FTC would probably challenge the merger
O Maybe. The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decislon.
Yes, the FTC would ignore the merger and allow it to go through.
HHI is used to calculate market power.
if the HHI index is less than 1000 post merger, the merger would be allowed to go through.
If the HHI index is between 1000 - 1800 post merger and the change in HHI is more than 100 after the merger, The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decislon.
If the HHI index is more than 1800 post merger and the change in HHI is more than or equal to 50, he FTC would probably challenge the merger
