1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aalyn [17]
3 years ago
15

i will give brainliest 5 stars and thank you please. According to the Justices, how can we combat the greatest threat to an inde

pendent judiciary?
History
1 answer:
andreev551 [17]3 years ago
3 0
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.

But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
You might be interested in
How did Humanism lead to the reformation of the church?
kicyunya [14]
<span>Humanism disliked how the church limited what people were allowed to study, publish, and even discuss.The church realized needed to reform and allow their parishioners some freedom in order to keep membership and/or peace.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
If josefina is the coach of a bseball team, she is also qualify to be
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
I believe it's <span>she is not necessarily qualified to be any of these choices

I hope this helps!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The Bill of Rights initially was intended to
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
The Bill of Rights was intended to restrict the power of the federal government.
5 0
3 years ago
The edict of Nantes guaranteed freedom to the ___ of France
jonny [76]
The correct answer to fill in the blank is the Calvinist(Huguenots)

hope this help and is what your looking for.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The amount of grain that a shape will hold is called the surface area. True or False
Maurinko [17]
False. That would be the area. Also, please change the subject from History to Mathematics. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did william Penris religious beliefs impact the founding of Pennsylvania?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help with 1 thru 5 questions thanks
    10·2 answers
  • What were some effects of the fear of communism that swept the United States in the 1950’s?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Shi Huangdi support a unified China?
    11·2 answers
  • ....................................................................................................
    6·1 answer
  • How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Western imperialism affect the culture of the colonies?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain briefly about anthropology
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What do Germany, Berlin, and Korea all have in common
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!