Answer:
It has been suppressed by <em>Grutter v. Bollinger (2003).</em>
Explanation:
According to the <u>University of California v. Bakke case</u> (1978), college applicants’ race was allowed to be a factor in the admission policy, though racial quotas were ruled as impermissible.
Meanwhile, in 2003 <u>Grutter v. Bollinger</u> <u>case</u> ended with a court's decision that<em> admission policy that favors poorly represented ethnic minority groups does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, only if the policy takes other factors, such as academic excellence, into account.</em>
Answer:
- <u><em>All real numbers except c = 0 and c = 3.</em></u>
Explanation:
The equation is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c553c/c553c42ef8cb12b9a77e0a7a4ed0b9d6ab4ada68" alt="\dfrac{1}{c-3}-\dfrac{1}{c}=\dfrac{3}{c(c-3)}"
Since c - 3, c, and c(c - 3) are he denominators, none of them can be equal to zero:
- c (c - 3) ≠ 0 ⇒ c ≠ 0 and c ≠ 3.
Now you can multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator: c (c - 3):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7563/c7563f4e2d7ad728a82ef789cbd1b81341cc35bb" alt="c-(c-3)=3\\\\c-c+3=3\\\\0=3-3\\\\0=0"
That means the equality is valid for all real numbers for which it is defined, which is all real numbers except c = 0 and c = 3.