81. The union of the Israel people that has been done through the help and effort of King David is very important. Why? Because it gave the Israel people the power to fight against their enemy and won. King David led the Israel people through God’s will and God’s command. He became a good leader of the Israelites. However, King David is just a human, and human are vulnerable of making mistakes or sins thus he also never escaped from temptation.
Answer and Explanation:
Hello. You did not enter the article to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Who provides information contained in an article, are other articles or other forms of text created by experts or research involving the topic that the article is presenting. It is for this reason that the sources of research are so important, as they are the ones that must provide true information for the construction of a new article.
Thus, the content of the article is influenced to inform proven facts, tested by trained people. Thus, the article is considerably relevant and efficient.
Loans given to families or individuals to purchase homes are called mortgage loans, named after J.P. Morgan.
Answer: Mortgage loans.
Answer: True
=================================================
Explanation:
The first amendment prohibits congress from making any law to prohibit free speech, so that means the federal government isn't allowed to restrict speech. However, there are exceptions such as speech to cause a riot, insurrection, obscenities on public airwaves, etc. all of which are not allowed.
In contrast, a private company like Twitter has the choice whether or not to allow or ban a certain post. The first amendment of the constitution does not apply to companies such as this one. On one hand, you could argue that such restriction is a bad thing because it limits speech; but you could also argue that if the government forced companies like Twitter to do a certain action, then it restricts their freedom.
For privately owned social media companies, their platform is something they solely own 100%, meaning that the government does not own or control what goes on that platform. So this is another viewpoint as to why the first amendment doesn't apply to these companies.
In a slight bit of confusing terminology, a private company can be publicly owned. This means that the government doesn't control the company, but rather it's traded on the stock market. Those who own stock in the company are part owners of it. You would have to use the phrasing "government owned and government run" to indicate that the government has full control of such a platform.
