Answer:
<u>"Alfred Binet"</u> would have been the least enthusiastic about relying on eugenics for the improvement of human intellectual functioning
Explanation:
Alfred Binet was a French psychologist is known for his broad research identified with the mental capacity of people. He was famous for building up the first generally utilized intelligence test, resulting the transformation in the fields of education and psychology. He is well known in the world of psychology.
Answer:
B) entrepreneur.
Explanation:
An entrepreneur refers to any individual who creates a business model based on innovation. They run the company and take responsibility for its performance. They play an important role in every economy making use of the requisite expertise and effort to identify requirements and bring innovative new concepts to the industry. Entrepreneurs who ultimately succeed in managing the risks of a venture are lauded with continued growth.
Explanation:
relating to human society at a very early stage of development, with people living in a simple way without machines or a writing system: ... Early settlers had to cope with very primitive living conditions.
Answer:
Oxytocin
Explanation:
Oxytocin stimulate(s) uterine contractions, cause(s) the breasts to "let down" milk, induce(s) a relaxed mood, and promote(s) responsiveness to the baby.
Oxytocin is a hormone secreted by the posterior pituitary gland and its two major functions are; the contraction of the womb (uterus) during childbirth and lactation (milk secretion/let down.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
