1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
agasfer [191]
3 years ago
10

In his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K. Lawson argued that William was able to win the Battl

e of Hastings because of considerable luck.' How far do you agree with this view of William's victory in 10667
[20]​
History
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

England, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Battle of Hastings was fought between the Duke of Normandy, the Norman-French militia of William, and King Harold Godwinson's English Army on 14th October 1066. This battle began because the king of England,  King Edward, died with appointing his successor. Accordingly, Harold Godwinson, who initially came to the throne of England, had to face two side struggle from Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy. However, William finally conquered the battle and the throne of England.

You might be interested in
PLZZZ HELPPP MEE I AMM SOO NOT SMART PLZZ HELPPp Part II: Brainstorm
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

Transportation now completely motorized and mostly fueled by crude oil has made traveling long distances faster, it is easier to visit relatives and stay in touch with friends even if you don't live near each other. The production of oil is done by large companies and often share holders are in politics. It has helped some in political gain by certain oil companies making large donations in a presidential candidate. It is now a political issue the continued use of an unrenewable resource has and continues to cause pollution, completely been the sole reason of some ecosystems end. Second, the phone now mostly we all have mobile phones that we can carry with us every where we go. Socially this new technology keeps us closer to our family and friends by being available for conversation, questions, etc at any moment. Before you would call there number and hope you caught them at home not busy with dinner or laundry etc. Economically the mobile phone has made having a phone readily available for everyone regardless of your spending limit there's a phone out there for you and it although put some of the traditional phone companies out of business it opened up a world full of possibilities to new companies. Politically the mobile phone has been a viable source of accurate news, and trade information. Social Media has socially allowed us to connect with people we know and people around the globe with opinions on topics we personally find intriguing. It has made even the socially awkward into social butterflies as you can read posts, comment, or post your own opinion and millions can view it. It along with text messaging definitely has caused loss of jobs in the post office. Before you would write a letter, buy a stamp and send it then the receiver would get your letter within 5 or so days and the have to write you a letter buy postage and send it to you. Now there's no postage no person to person delivery system you can just press send and your text message or social media message is received instantly. This has economically brought phone companies both old and new to the forefront of our economy. Politically it has both helped and hindered some presidential candidates because even the president uses Twitter now I could continue but maybe that will help get your ideas flowing. Basically they want you to debate modern technology both pros and cons and you are definately smart enough to do that.

6 0
3 years ago
Match the characteristics below to the civilization to which they belong.
Blababa [14]
1.A
2.D
3.E
4.G
5.B
6.F
7.C
7 0
3 years ago
In his inaugural address, president kennedy proves he is a forward thinker by focusing on what main idea?
garri49 [273]
Maybe it’s doing things for your country. I’m not sure. I just know the line “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
5 0
3 years ago
What were two arguments for and two arguments against annexation of the Philippines? Which side do you agree with and why?
vovikov84 [41]
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.
5 0
2 years ago
Which was a major cause of the Tuscarora War? O Tribal lands were being overrun by white settlers. O Tribal leaders kidnapped an
Over [174]

Answer:

Tribal lands were being overrun by white settlers

Explanation:

In 1711 White settlers took over tribal lands for livestock, crops, and housing. They also captured and enslaved the Tribals.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help with a Civics question
    13·1 answer
  • Compared with the US Constitution, how difficult is it to amend state constitutions?
    11·2 answers
  • What Are The Main Players In Command Economy ?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the most populous state, which has 52 representatives?
    11·1 answer
  • Gandhi helped free the Indians from the British rule with__________
    12·1 answer
  • U.S. territories must be​
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the United States sign the Jay Treaty with Britain?
    15·1 answer
  • In 1877, one of the first and most violent strikes occurred when _____ workers held a nationwide work stoppage to protest their
    5·1 answer
  • True or False: The Allied Powers included Germany, Great Britain, France, and Russia.
    11·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!