1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
agasfer [191]
3 years ago
10

In his book, The Battle of Hastings 1066, published in 2003, historian M.K. Lawson argued that William was able to win the Battl

e of Hastings because of considerable luck.' How far do you agree with this view of William's victory in 10667
[20]​
History
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

England, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Battle of Hastings was fought between the Duke of Normandy, the Norman-French militia of William, and King Harold Godwinson's English Army on 14th October 1066. This battle began because the king of England,  King Edward, died with appointing his successor. Accordingly, Harold Godwinson, who initially came to the throne of England, had to face two side struggle from Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy. However, William finally conquered the battle and the throne of England.

You might be interested in
How hitler controlled germany​
motikmotik

Answer:

Hitler became dictator of Germany by merging the offices and powers of the Chancellery and Presidency. A national referendum held on 19 August 1934 confirmed Hitler as the sole Leader of Germany.

Explanation:

:)

brainliest?

7 0
2 years ago
How did the Navajo serve in World War II?
lana [24]

Answer:

The answer is A: As code talkers in the Pacific

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Please help aspppp will mark brainliest
juin [17]

Answer:

16 marbles

Explanation:

this is bc the marbles that she took were put back in the box without being placed outside

6 0
3 years ago
The feudal system probably would not have developed if the Roman Empire continued. Why?
Natali [406]

Answer:

C. A strong military would have been in place to protect people from invaders.

 Europe went under the control of new pioneers right after the fall of the empire, yet the new districts were powerless. The primitive framework gave landowners and laborers security through a master and his military. This framework secured arrives in return for work and charges.

<em>If the Roman Empire continued, the Roman armed force would have shielded the realm from intrusion.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the impact of European (Anglo) settlers on the Native Americans in Texas.
    6·1 answer
  • The prevalence of _____ thinking encouraged slavery to develop in the South. A. Puritan<br> B. industrial<br> C. aristocratic<br
    11·1 answer
  • The first efforts by the united states to create a professional foreign service staff started ________.
    9·2 answers
  • What happened after the Haitian Revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Booker T. Washington is noted for which of the following?
    15·2 answers
  • How were the House of Burgesses chosen?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was a Bill of Rights needed?
    5·1 answer
  • What did Washington believe about America having a world identity?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the standard way the President gets their job?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe two important details about industrialization in Europe in the 19th century.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!