1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
8

Is a nuclear threat still possible in our current society? Why or why not?

History
2 answers:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes, nuclear threat is still possible.

Explanation:

The danger of nuclear weapons is a shared danger, worldwide. Future treaties will require increasingly sophisticated verification technology. Nuclear weapons continue to play a vital role in NATO security, to preserve peace, prevent coercion and deter aggression. Climate change will become even more real if there’s a “nuclear winter.” We have no idea who is capable of making or havng nukclear weapons

AleksAgata [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes, There can still be a threat.

Explanation:

"While it has been more than twenty years since the end of the Cold War, the existence of thousands of nuclear weapons continues to pose a serious global threat. The likelihood of a nuclear war between the United States and Russia has decreased, but the continued presence of large stockpiles makes the accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons a persistent risk. Many of the countries with smaller nuclear arsenals, such as India and Pakistan, are actively engaged in regional conflicts, making the possibility of regional nuclear war a concern. North Korea illicitly acquired nuclear weapons, and other countries, including Syria, have violated their nuclear safeguards commitments and are suspected of covertly pursuing nuclear weapons capabilities" (nti.org)

Terrorism also poses a nuclear threat, most notably ones are 9/11, London Bombing, and many more.

You might be interested in
How did colonization affect the lives of people in southeast asia ?
Montano1993 [528]
 <span>They are mixed with good and bad. I am from Thailand and we are proud to be an independent. We have never colonized by any countries. 

If you talk to someone from the Philippines, they probably happy to be colonized by the American (I have no ideas why, but the Filipinos are weird--they don't love their country). Many do like the Spanish however... 

If you talk to someone from Burmar, Laos, Cambodia. they probably oppose about the colonization because the French and the English had done nothing to their countries.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What u.s actions alarmed the Soviet union​
Mekhanik [1.2K]

The United States was alarmed by Soviet control of Eastern Europe at the end WW II because officials believed Soviet expansion would not stop at Eastern Europe.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Grand Alliance, otherwise called The Big Three, was a military union comprising of the three significant Allies of World War II: the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a perplexing exchange of ideological, political, and monetary elements, which prompted moves between wary collaboration and frequently severe superpower contention throughout the years.

7 0
3 years ago
Following the death of Queen Anne in 1714, George I was crowned as king of Britain. Which of the following statements describes
TEA [102]

Answer: He had little domestic interest in Britain and allowed Parliament to consolidate the gains of the Glorious Revolution.

Explanation:

George I was the ruler of a Duchy in Germany before he became King of England and upon his succession, he was not very interested in the affairs of Britain and was frequently going back to Germany. It was even said that he did not speak a lot of English.

These factors and more allowed Parliament and the Prime Minister, Robert Walpole, to claw power from the Monarchy such that after George I died, the Prime Ministerial position got stronger with every succeeding monarch.

7 0
2 years ago
6
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is D

Explanation:

The Emancipation proclamation made the Civil war about slavery and no longer about state vs the federal government, therefore, the European powers didn't want to "dirty their hands" with such involvement

hope this helped!

6 0
2 years ago
True or false Thomas Hobbes would not have liked the us constitution because it gives power to multiple people rather than limit
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which argumentative statement is a claim of fact?
    9·2 answers
  • An explanation of how Ancient Greek pottery was unearthed in India please help me asap
    6·1 answer
  • Were critics of WWI anti-American? Include evidence drawn from at least 3 of today’s documents.
    6·1 answer
  • Successful implementation of EBPH in public health practice is:________
    13·1 answer
  • Why is hypothermia used in an open heart surgery?
    8·1 answer
  • (Please answer asap I really need to get this test done!!) Which describes the reason for hardship in the Muslim world during th
    14·1 answer
  • 1. anthropology
    9·2 answers
  • Is government responsible for the economic well-being of its citizens?”
    7·1 answer
  • What did the Greek historian Herodotus call Egypt?
    14·2 answers
  • How does the US Constitution protect Americans and their personal freedoms from an all-powerful Government?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!