I belive that the president should have two terms because if the president had infinite terms, he would more of a pharoah and therefore turn into a monarchy rather than a democracy.
I really hope this helps you. I cannot confirm this answer but good luck anyway!
"If the ruling dynasty was wealthy, it would keep the Mandate of Heaven" is the best answer from the list, but it should be noted this was not always the case.
Literally what the dude above me said
Answer:
1. He was A French military officer; he also was a political leader. He rose to prominence during the French revolution. Many of his campaigns were a success. He led to power by starting off as a military officer.
2. Napoleon had stabilized France, He brought it in good reforms, but not the way the French Revolution wanted it to be. By taking power, he didn't share the power equally, back to what had started the Revolution with Estates and Political Inequality. Another thing they argued about was that Napoleon was the best of Military leader of all time.
Checks and balances are a system where one branch of the government holds no more power over one another. For example, a law must be passed through the senate, and then is checked by the House of Representatives before finally being voted in. The president how ever, has more Jurors diction over both the House and the senate ultimately having the power to veto a law if necessary. (May want to double check the order I’ve said things).
