Answer:
Response of Latin America to Policies Found in the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary:
They were considered an unwelcome intrusion in Latin American affairs.
Explanation:
The Monroe Doctrine is the U.S. policy toward the Western Hemisphere, in which European nations were warned not to engage in further colonization of the geographical zone or continue the institutionalization of puppet monarchy in Latin America. It was delivered to Congress in December, 1823 during President James Monroe's message to Congress.
The Roosevelt Corollary of December 1904 stated that the United States would intervene as a last resort to ensure that other nations in the Western Hemisphere fulfilled their obligations to international creditors, and did not violate the rights of the United States or invite “foreign aggression to the detriment of the United States.
Latin American nations viewed the Monroe Doctrine policies and the Roosevelt Corollary as a combined intrusion into their sovereignty.
D. right before he sees the footprint in the sand
Hope this helps.
Lee wanted them to dig trenches before Burnside’s army arrived.
Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
