Answer:
for refusing to applaud. for committing a crime against the state. for failing to rise from his seat.
Answer:
It occurred august 4th, 1735 in the colony of New York. This case is about the government who tried to silence a man because they didn’t like what he was saying. At the time the government was the king and there was no First Amendment. The jury found him not guilty because they saw this for what it was. This is a good example of the colonists believing the government should have limited power, and led directly to the First Amendment 40 years later
hope this helps!✌️
Four ways to reduce political polarization are reforming the election process, assuring proportionality, increasing turnout and reforming the legislative process.
Reforming the election process:
One can reform the election process by abolishing primary elections and allowing the state and local party organizations to choose nominees. Adopting instant run-off elections can also help.
Assuring proportionality:
If the party which receives the most votes does not win the most seats, reserving some seats to such a party can help assure proportionality.
Increasing turnout:
A low turnout can be dealt with by making voting mandatory, creating incentives to lure more voters and by stopping voter suppression.
Reforming the legislative process:
This can be achieved by adopting a parliamentary system and abolishing the filibuster. Reducing transparency and allowing more latitude for negotiation and compromise can also help.
Know more about political polarization:
brainly.com/question/25226801
