Answer: These rights are considered natural laws, or natural rights. They are represented very clearly in the United States' Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
It was, and still is, a staple import of the united kingdom, which at one time had possession of the 13 colonies of America, India and Hong Kong. As such, these three countries maintain to this day a strong trade network with the UK and her former colonies.
Historically, hair has been considered class evidence because a hair specimen could not be identified with certainty as having originated from a particular person. A forensic scientist who studied the morphology (shape, form, and structure) of a hair specimen could testify as to the gross physical characteristics of the hair (color, degree of curl, etc.), its internal and external structural characteristics, the likely somatic region from which the hair originated (scalp, beard, pubic, axillary, etc.), and–at least for scalp hair, and often for pubic hair, the probable race of the person from whom the hair originated. But all of those are class characteristics rather than individual characteristics, so the most the forensic scientist can state based on morphological examination is that a hair specimen is “consistent with” or “similar in all respect to” another specimen.