At a restaurant, table A's bill of $72 is split equally between the people at the table
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<u>Question Completion</u>
(a)What is your null hypothesis?
(b)What is your expected phenotypic ratio based on Mendelian inheritance?
(c)Calculate the expected number of flowers you should have gotten based on the Mendelian inheritance. Then calculate a chi-square value, degrees of freedom, and a p-value.
- Chi-square statistic: _____
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1):
- P-value:
(d)Interpret your results. Do you reject it or fail to reject your null hypothesis (please restate the null)?
Answer:
(a)
(b)9:3:3:1
(c)
- Chi-square statistic: 3.8914
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1) =3
- P-value: 0.2734
(d)We fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the flowering plant, white flowers (B) are dominant over red flowers (b), and short plants (E) are dominant over tall flowers (e). An F2 generation was created by crossing two F1 individuals (each BbEe).
(a)The null hypothesis is:
(b)The gametes are BE, Be, bE and be.
The offsprings are presented in the table below:
The expected phenotypic ratio based on Mendelian inheritance
BE:Be:bE:be=9:3:3:1
(c)
Therefore:
- Chi-square statistic: 3.8914
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1): 4-1 =3
- P-value: 0.2734
(d) Our null hypothesis is:
Since p>0.05, the given data fit the predicted phenotypic ratio.
We, therefore, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
The difference in the observed and expected are sosmall that they can be attributed to random chance.
Answer:
A) Distance time graph
B) d(t) = 25t
C) The expression shows the distance more clearly.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) A distance time graph as seen in the attachment provides a representation of the distance travelled.
We are told the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds. Which means that 100 m for each 4 hours. So, for 200m, it's 8 hours like seen in the graph and for 300m,it's 12 hours as seen in the graph.
B) And expression for the distance is;
d = vt
Where;
d is distance in metres
v is speed in m/s and t is time
We are told that the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds.
Thus, v = 100/4 = 25 m/s
Distance travelled over time is;
d(t) = 25t
C) Looking at both A and B above, it's obvious that the expression of the distance shows a more clearer way of getting the distance because once we know the time travelled, we will just plug it into the equation and get the distance. Whereas, for the representation form, one will need to longer graphs if the time spent is very long.
