Answer:
Desire for more citizens
Explanation:
Imperialism is defined as the domination of one country over other country through using military forces, political influence, or other means.
There are several causes of imperialism that include need for raw materials to control a supply of raw materials over countries and spreading Christianity is also a cause of imperialism as establishment of church and force people to convert new members into Christians.
Desire for more citizens is not a cause of imperialism do not focus on increasing population.
Hence, the correct answer is "Desire for more citizens".
This is just a helpful reminder because i haven’t read the book yet but here’s how you can tell what perspective (POV) it is:
(1st perspective uses:
We, us, our,and ourselves are all first-person pronouns. Specifically, they are plural first-person pronouns. Singular first-person pronouns include I, me, my, mine and myself.)
&
(2nd perspective uses:
you (singular and plural personal pronoun)
yours (singular and plural possessive pronoun)
yourself and yourselves (singular and plural reflexive/intensive pronouns))
&
(3rd perspective uses:
he, him, his, himself, she, her, hers, herself, it, its, itself, they, them, their, theirs, and themselves)
<span>In india, the great tradition of indian thought and religion emerged after 600
b.c.e. out of the "</span>Ganges Civilization".
Hello there.
<span>What thee r's are associated with dressing the worlds waste?
</span>
Answer: It is Reduce , Reuse and Recycle.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck Studying ^-^
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
